Old school astro film shots had a look digital still can't touch

I've been messing with some old film scans from the 90s I took with a beat up Pentax and a manual tracker, and every time I post one someone jumps in saying it's a Photoshop effect or some stacked digital trick. These were single exposures on Kodak Ektachrome, no stacking, no software, just patience and a clear night near a dark sky reserve in West Virginia. Does anyone else feel like the instant perfection of digital processing makes people forget what a single honest frame actually looks like?

2 comments

2 Comments

nathanb7124d ago

One buddy of mine from college still swears by his old-school film setup for astro. He drove six hours to the Gila National Forest last fall with a beat-up Mamiya and some Portra 400. Spent three nights there, got maybe two usable frames because of dew and light leaks. He scanned one and posted it, and within an hour someone called it a fake composite. He just laughed and sent them a pic of his film roll with the frame numbers visible. That kind of direct authenticity is something digital just cant fake, no matter how many layers you stack. The grain, the color shift, the slight imperfections feel real because they are real. Its like comparing a hand-drawn portrait to a filtered selfie. Both have their place, but the hand-drawn one carries a weight digital never will.

quinnj2424d ago

I mean, at the end of the day it's still just a picture.